Denise Richards is really going for the throat with Charlie Sheen.Amongst the disturbing allegations the unemployed and unemployable actress has leveled against Charlie Sheen is the new revelation that she is concerned that he is molesting their daughters. THIS IS UNREAL!
Among her weapons: the sworn declaration of their former nanny, Diana Alvarez.
Among other allegations, Alvarez raises the specter of whether Sheen inappropriately touched the girls’ “molees” (their nickname for breasts) and their “tushys.” Though she lacks concrete evidence, Alvarez claims to be “concerned.” She’s also “alarmed” by Sheen’s sleeping in the same bed as Sam when his fiancée, Brooke Mueller, is in the guest room.
This is reprehensible! To even suggest such a thing if she’s not 100% certain! Denise needs some serious help, let’s only pray that these allegations are false and its just a crazy Denise Richards trying to get revenge (and that is even too dark to imagine). On another note, two celebrity articles about hurting kids in one day. I think I am gonna watch tv and get away from the tabloid news.
Post a Response
Comment by corrie on 28 September 2007:
i pity her because its her only way of returning to the public and she’s just doing it wrongly
Comment by Jennifer on 2 October 2007:
She sure has a lot to say about someone for a person who cheats on her husband and steals her best friend’s husband. This is the dirtiest divorce I’ve seen. You would think 2 people in the limelight would have enough respect to not destroy each other’s careers, or lack there of. If she thought he’d molested their kids, why did she wait to bring that up until she’d said everything else she could think up?
Comment by mel on 8 August 2008:
One out of every three-five children will be sexually abused by the age of 18; half by their biological fathers. The statistics are based on scientific evidence in the empirical literature. There is not always physical evidence of molestation for obvious reasons, but often psychological evidence revealed in “acting out” behaviors and a variety of other FORENSIC tests that DO NOT involve leading questions. Until any of you at this board are FORENSIC experts, you have no expertise to make any comments. There is a myth about protective mothers and parents, that they are somehow coming from a vengeful place. The majority of them are not when you research the empirical literature. Since I am not an expert in this case, it is not for me to say whether or not Sheen abused his daughters; however, the empirical literature and his behaviors in general (e.g., sex addictions, rage, narcissism, explicitly abusive and inappropriate emails to the mother of his children) would compel me to scrutizine this case quite closely if I were an expert or judge presiding over the case, especially if the children are exhibiting symptoms that denote sexual abuse (e.g., sexually acting out, post-traumatic-stress-disorder, night-mares, inconsollable tantrums, etc.). Dispel the myth of “Medea” or the “woman scorned” because most mothers are not coming from a vengeful place; although a small percentage are. Further, “inconclusive” or “unsubstantiated” does not mean the abuse did not occur. It simply means there wasn’t enough PHYSICAL evidence, such as torn tissue, to hold up in trial to convict the perp. or to mandate supervised visitation. Also, perhaps it isn’t Denise that went public with the info., but the Papparazzi.